Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kathleen McCroskey's avatar

“only response is vicious revanchism and more wars; all at a time in history when wars are no longer affordable."

Wars are more than unaffordable - they represent devastating destruction beyond what humanity is already doing to this planet.

If, for instance, someone is proposing “universal income,” I would next ask, “What is your currency peg?” Because for certain, the System would eat that flow of money for lunch. Same scenario if someone is proposing a different voting scheme or political system - how do you propose coalescing enough power to actually govern? I‘ve worked in the system, exec committee for a federal riding assoc, I know what goes into the sausage. Andrew Coyne’s new book describe the problems somewhat well, but misses the deep connection to money, that to keep even the volunteer job at the local association, each exec member is expected to bring in $10K in donations from area businesses. Per month. Also, the articles by Andrew Coyne and Laurence Mussio in Saturday’s Globe and Mail Opinion section, are very good. But nobody reads newspapers anymore, which can be a means of transmitting elder’s knowledge to society.

Expand full comment
Vera Gottlieb's avatar

I don't think abolishing all political parties even begins to solve our problems. Rather...take serious charge against corruption, nepotism, oligarchy, dishonesty, theft. We seem to forget what integrity, morals, ethics are all about - our society is 'turning blind' and only sees that which serves its purposes. Our selfishness makes us turn inward and no regard for others.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts