Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Derek Stratton's avatar

Read Alex Himelfarb 's book Neoliberalism Canada's Challenge.

Expand full comment
GS-z-14-1's avatar

The ‘Samara’ graphic favours the premise that I am politically illiterate.

But this is not because …

—I refuse to vote,

—I refuse to advance my political interests,

—I am impervious to partizan propaganda,

—I refuse politically inclusive compromise,

—I refuse to work with or to recognize the regime.

I am politically illiterate because of a principled commitment to dialectical examination of the interaction of historical, material, social class tendencies. So when I read that …

‘We are in a time where political, historic and civic literacy are more important than ever.’

I reply that …

‘We are in a time where political, historic and civic literacy have never mattered less.’

TIME Canada described Canadians as ‘borderline nihilists’ in the early 1990s.

The ‘great, free, land’ creed is a propagandic lie utilized as an instrument of social control. It is based on the premise that if people think that they are ‘free,’ they will not try to BECOME free. They will be nice, quiet, manageable, doting, respectful little taxpayers—model citizens who live second hand lives, tailored to fit the interests of its ruling class.

More than one parliamentary prostitute has fled — yes, FLED — when I asked such questions as, ‘what is the foundation of political authority; what constitutes the right to speak with the expectation of obedience; where can one look to see evidence of the veracity of that answer; what MAKES it right, and exactly WHY are we obligated to believe that?

Canadians have the right to be a people. They have the right to institutions and processes of state that are truly their own. They have the right to ‘leaders’ who speak through their own lips. They have the right to create new, legal structures within the context of which, their essential material and civic interests may be articulated, pursued and realized in an orderly and responsible manner. Canadians need permission from NO ONE to do these things.

Classically speaking, three criteria distinguish illegitimate, stateless, actors from lawfully regimes with a legitimate claim to the dutiful, consensual allegiance of its those living in its borders. There must be:

1] Sufficient power to govern.

2] Sufficient commitment to justice.

3] Sufficient identification with the population.

All three of these points must be in operation at every moment of time. If even one of these three criteria ceases to be true, the state ceases to be legitimate.

All people do not make those determinations at the same time. Some require a greater burden of proof, some less. For me, it ceased to be ‘my government’ many decades ago. I have waited most of my life for the time when Canadians would find courage to face what the lordly, Canadian kakistocracy, IS.

Fat City has abandoned the citizenry to its own destiny.

The only logical response is to recognize this reality for what it is, and to abandon the kakistocracy to ITS own destiny.

For myself, I refuse to be retained as a political hostage to the machinations of an illicit, lawless regime bent on barbarity, the debasement of its population and its attacks on humanity abroad.

Why would any sentient, bipedal being do otherwise?

Bring those involved in such crimes as you name to the bar of justice.

If the courts won’t do so [and they won’t], develop new procedures, laws, courts, and such means and agencies as will do so. Begin the work of drafting a new Constitution for establishing a legitimate state.

Then, I will cast a ballot, let my name stand for public office, do jury duty, etc., etc.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts